Are you struggling with the visual consistency of your web application across different devices or browsers? If yes, then you are not alone. Around 70 percent of businesses experience this challenge. Visual consistency helps organizations enhance user experience and establish brand identity and trust. That’s where the significance of visual UI testing becomes essential. However, the testing process can be daunting, especially when dealing with dynamic content, responsive designs, and asynchronous operations.
Further, the growth of a user-centric approach demands that every aspect of software development deliver customer satisfaction. Therefore, organizations need more than the conventional testing methodology. Additionally, modern applications’ dynamic and complex user interfaces require more sophisticated testing methods. This is where Cypress, a robust end-to-end testing framework, emerges. It provides instant feedback with real-time reloading, which allows developers to see the changes immediately.
In this blog, we will explore best practices for UI testing with Cypress, helping you overcome common challenges and achieve reliable, comprehensive visual verification. Let’s dive in and explore how you can master visual UI with Cypress.
Getting Started with Visual Testing in Cypress
Install Cypress
Start by installing the Cypress using npm as a development dependency:
```bash
npm install cypress --save-dev
```
Set Up Visual Testing Tool
For visual testing purposes, leading testing automation companies prefer installing the Eyes Cypress SDK:
```bash
npm install @eyes-cypress --save-dev
```
Write a Visual Test
Next, create a Cypress test file, such as `visual_test.spec.js,` and write a simple visual test:
```javascript
// visual_test.spec.js
const { eyesOpen, eyesCheckWindow, eyesClose } = require('@applitools/eyes-cypress');
describe('Visual Testing Example', () => {
it('should display the homepage correctly', () => {
// Open your eyes and start the visual test
eyes-open({
appName: 'Your App Name',
testName: 'Homepage Test',
});
// Visit the homepage
cy.visit('https://your-app-url.com');
// Capture a screenshot and check for visual differences
eyesCheckWindow('Homepage');
// Close the eyes and end the visual test
eyes close();
});
});
```
Run the Visual Test
Run Cypress and execute the visual test:
```bash
npx cypress run
```
Visual UI Testing Techniques For Improving UI
Complete Page Testing
One of the recommended approaches for visual testing is verifying the entire page. This method captures and verifies everything on the screen. It further ensures comprehensive coverage and reduces the chance of missing key assertion points. This prevents new baselines due to browser viewport variances. This method ensures that the whole screen is captured, even if it needs to scroll to capture it all. Use CSS stitching for pages with sticky headers to avoid duplicating the header in the screenshots.
Annotations
Annotations are a crucial aspect for any Cypress Testing Companies, as they add flexibility to visual tests by allowing specific parts of screenshots to be masked or highlighted. Additionally, ignoring annotation helps mask irrelevant parts, such as dynamic data in mobile app status bars. Applying annotations programmatically using a fluent check is recommended, as it saves time and reduces maintenance by masking areas across different environments. This annotation is helpful for items that can shift on the page or layouts ideal for dynamic data. Strict and content annotations can also be applied to specific regions for precise verification.
Match Levels
Cypress automation tool offers various match levels to specify how visual validations should be performed. The default and recommended level is Strict, which uses AI to compare baseline and current images, detecting changes visible to the human eye. The Content match level ignores color differences, making it useful for applications where content is crucial but color is not. Layout verifies the layout pattern without considering the actual data, which is ideal for dynamic content like news sites. The Exact match level performs pixel-to-pixel comparisons but is not recommended due to its high flakiness and susceptibility to false negatives.
Element Testing
Cypress testing companies use element testing to verify a page’s specific elements, regions, or frames. This technique is proper when your test targets particular parts of the page, such as adding an item to a shopping cart. But ensure all the necessary topics are addressed to ensure your testing is manageable. Combining visual assertions with functional tests can provide coverage and ensure comprehensive testing.
Component Testing
Component testing means testing individual parts of the front end separately from the whole application. This is an excellent option for checking how components look for different user actions, like when he hovers over them, focuses on them, or opens them. To do this, you can use Storybook to make a library of components and test them with the Storybook SDK. By testing each element, you can ensure they look right before adding them to the entire application.
Best Practices For Cypress Visual UI Testing
Setting Up Cypress for Visual Testing
Install Cypress and any required plugins first to ensure your testing environment is ready. To explore your application effectively, use Cypress commands like `cy. visit()} and `cy.get()}. Cypress can be integrated with visual testing tools to improve visual verification and produce more dependable and accurate findings.
Handling Asynchronous Operations
Effectively handling asynchronous operations is crucial for accurate visual testing. To handle asynchronous operations, use Cypress commands like `cy.wait()` and `cy.intercept()`. Proper synchronization is essential to capture accurate visual snapshots, especially during dynamic content loading, ensuring that your UI testing reflects the application’s actual state.
Configuring Viewports and Responsive Testing
Use different viewports to test how your application behaves with varying screen widths. Implement responsive testing using `cy.viewport()` to simulate other devices and orientations. This procedure guarantees that your application’s user experience is consistent across all platforms and screen sizes.
Selective Testing with Visual Snapshots
Visual snapshots allow you to take and compare pictures of particular parts or pages. Use the baseline photographs to spot unexpected visual changes throughout further test sessions. The Cypress automation tool offers a targeted approach that helps maintain the visual integrity of critical parts of your application without being overwhelmed by irrelevant changes.
Handling Dynamic Data
Dynamic data can often lead to false positives in visual tests. Use fixtures or API calls to parameterize your tests so that they can handle dynamic data. To prevent errors, keep dynamic content out of visual comparisons. This ensures that your visual tests remain stable and reliable, even when the underlying data changes frequently.
Custom Commands for Reusability
Encapsulating visual testing logic in bespoke Cypress commands increases code reusability. By abstracting common visual testing patterns, you can simplify and make your test scripts more maintainable. Cypress automation services procedure lowers the possibility of errors and improves the effectiveness of your testing process.
Integrating Visual Testing into Continuous Integration
Integrate visual tests into your CI/CD process to automate their execution with each code push. Create visual testing tiers to consider expected alterations in appearance and prevent false positives. By ensuring that visual regressions are detected early in the development process, this integration helps you maintain the caliber of your application.
Handling Time-Dependent Visuals
Time-dependent visuals, such as animations or loading spinners, can be challenging to test. Manage these visuals by adjusting timeouts and delays in your tests. Cypress Testing Companies use commands like `cy.clock()` to gain precise control over time-related actions, ensuring that their visual tests are accurate and reliable.
Debugging Visual Test Failures
Utilize the included debugging tools in Cypress to examine components and resolve test errors. Reports from visual tests can be used to determine the underlying reason for visual disparities. This detailed analysis lets you quickly resolve issues and maintain your application’s visual integrity.
Version Control and Collaboration
Keep baseline images in version control to monitor changes over time and guarantee consistent testing across several application iterations. To collaborate effectively, maintain consistent baseline images across all team members. Testing automation companies use best practices to foster better communication and coordination, which results in more robust and reliable visual testing outcomes.
Wrap Up
Visual testing aims to provide an ideal user experience, not just pretty pictures and pixels. By using Cypress as your testing partner and following best practices, you can protect the integrity of your application. These best practices will refine your application and ensure your testing suite becomes an unwavering defender of visual quality.
Your users should receive something equal to what you can ensure with your dedication to visual user interface testing. Remember, beyond conventional testing techniques, visual UI testing concentrates on the visual components that significantly influence user engagement and pleasure. So, incorporating these best practices ensures your application functions correctly and delivers a visually consistent and engaging experience across all platforms.
AutomationQA
Latest posts by AutomationQA (see all)
- Cypress in Action: Enhancing Software Testing in Modern Development Practices - October 18, 2024
- Achieving QA Excellence By Implementing Continuous Test Automation for Faster, Better Software - October 10, 2024
- Mastering Mobile App Testing With Top Selenium Best Practices - October 3, 2024